Abstract

Two pigeons were trained on the two-choice ambiguous-cue problem that contained two types of trials. On PA trials, choice of P (the positive stimulus) is reinforced and choice of A (the ambiguous stimulus) is not reinforced; on NA trials, choice of A is reinforced and choice of N (the negative stimulus) is not reinforced. Under the various across-trial fixed-ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement, NA performance remained superior to PA performance. PA performance was poorer under FR 12 than FR 1; NA performance, however, was not affected by the size of the FR. Similarly, only PA performance showed any change as a function of the trial’s location within the ratio—it was poorest early in the ratio.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.