Regulatory T Cells Are Not Required for Prevention of RBC-Specific Autoantibody Generation

Abstract

Introduction: Loss of humoral tolerance to red blood cell (RBC) antigens may lead to the generation of pathogenic autoantibodies and result in autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), a severe and potentially fatal disease. Failure of tolerance to RBC antigens occurs with considerable frequency (1-3 cases/1,000 adults) and prevalence of AIHA is as high as 30% in persons with compromised B and/or T cell tolerance mechanisms. However, RBC-specific tolerance mechanisms are poorly understood. To elucidate the immune tolerances to RBC autoantigens, we utilized HOD mice. The HOD mouse expresses an RBC-specific transgene consisting of hen egg lysozyme (HEL), ovalbumin (OVA), and Duffy. Using the HOD model, we previously demonstrated B cell tolerance to RBC-specific HOD antigen is incomplete; however, T cell tolerance is stringent. HOD mice have similar detectable frequencies of HOD-specific CD4+ T cells compared to B6 mice. Although present, autoreactive HOD-specific CD4+ T cells are non-functional. Circumventing T cell tolerance by adoptive transfer, HOD mice make high titer anti-HOD autoantibodies in vivo. Thus, despite the presence of autoreactive B cells, no HOD-reactive antibodies are detectable unless CD4+ T cells are given, indicating T cell tolerance is a stopgap to autoimmunity. Methods: Leukocytes from C57BL/6 (B6) and HOD mice were harvested and OVA-specific CD4+ T cell responses were assessed by tetramer-pulldown assays with pooled tetramers I-Ab-OVA 329-337/326-334. Isolated cells were stained for surface and intracellular markers and analyzed via flow cytometry. For in vivo analysis, mice were treated with 300ug anti-CD25 (clone PC-61) depleting antibody or isotype control; a subset of antibody-treated mice was immunized with OVA/CFA. Antibodies bound to HOD RBCs were determined by direct antibody test. Anti-HOD antibodies were quantified by indirect immunofluorescence using HOD RBCs as targets. Results: Tetramer pull-down assays revealed similar numbers of OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells from HOD and B6 mice (mean 56 and 40, respectively, p = 0.3). However, cell surface and intracellular marker staining demonstrated that HOD mice had higher numbers of OVA-tetramer reactive CD4+ T cells that express regulatory markers CD25 and FoxP3, and exhaustion marker PD1 as compared to control B6 mice. Inhibitory CTLA4 expression was not detectable on OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells from HOD or B6 mice. To test whether regulatory T cells were required for RBC-specific immune tolerance, HOD and B6 mice were treated with CD25 depleting antibody or isotype control antibody. Anti-CD25 antibody treated mice had a significant reduction of CD25+ cells 4 days post treatment (p < 0.001, 2 independent experiments). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in FoxP3+CD25+CD4+ T cells (Tregs) in anti-CD25 treated mice (p < 0.001), compared to isotype. Mice received weekly injections of anti-CD25 or isotype antibody to maintain depletion for one month. A subset of mice received an OVA/CFA immunization. Sustained CD25+ depletion did not result in anti-HOD autoantibody generation. Further, there was no change in the endogenous frequency of OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells between HOD and B6 mice, regardless of antibody treatment. Similarly, HOD mice treated with depletion (or isotype) antibody and immunized with OVA/CFA did not make detectable anti-HOD autoantibodies. Consistent with lack of detectable autoantibodies, no expansion of OVA-tetramer reactive CD4+ T cells was observed in HOD mice. In contrast, B6 mice (treated with anti-CD25 or isotype antibody) had a detectable expansion of OVA-specific CD4+ T cells as a result of immunization. Conclusions: The data demonstrate a phenotypic difference between the OVA-reactive CD4+ T cells from HOD and B6 mice, with an increase in number of Tregs detectable in HOD mice. Administration of anti-CD25 antibody significantly reduced the number of overall CD25+ cells and Tregs. Prolonged depletion of these cellular subsets did not elicit autoantibodies in HOD mice. Further, immunization of CD25 depleted mice with a strong immune stimulus (OVA/CFA, known to expand OVA-reactive T cells in B6 mice), did not induce anti-HOD autoantibodies nor did it expand OVA-specific autoreactive CD4+ T cells in HOD mice. Together, these data demonstrate that CD25+ cells are not required for the maintenance of RBC-specific T cell tolerance and suggest a role for other regulatory mechanisms. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.