Abstract

We propose that decision maker’s regulatory mode affects risk-taking through anticipated regret. In the Study 1 either a locomotion or an assessment orientation were experimentally induced, and in the Studies 2 and 3 these different orientations were assessed as chronic individual differences. To assess risk-taking we used two behavioral measures of risk: BART and hot-CCT. The results show that experimentally induced assessment orientation–compared to locomotion–leads to decreased risk-taking through increased anticipated regret (Study 1). People chronically predisposed to be in the assessment state take less risk through increased anticipated regret (Study 2 and Study 3). Study 2 results also show a marginally non-significant indirect effect of chronic locomotion mode on BART through anticipated regret. Differently, Study 3 shows that people chronically predisposed to be in the locomotion state take greater risk through decreased anticipated regret, when play a dynamic risk task triggering stronger emotional arousal. Through all three studies, the average effect size for the relationship of assessment with anticipated regret was in the moderate-large range, whereas for risk-taking was in the moderate range. The average effect size for the relationship of locomotion with anticipated regret was in the moderate range, whereas for risk-taking was in the small-moderate range. These results increase our understanding of human behavior under conditions of risk obtaining novel insights into regulatory mode theory and decision science.

Highlights

  • Some people take more risks than others, almost any human endeavor carries some element of risk

  • Two one-way ANOVAs were carried out to investigate the effect of experimentally induced regulatory mode on both risk-taking and anticipated regret

  • We found a significant effect of locomotion orientation–compared to assessment orientation–on average adjusted pumps (AAP), F(1,109) = 6.01, p < .05, Cohen’s d = .46, indicating that participants in the locomotion condition pumped more (M = 34.17, SD = 15.14) than those in the assessment condition (M = 27.58, SD = 12.98)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Some people take more risks than others, almost any human endeavor carries some element of risk. Some authors [1, 2] have suggested that people tend to appraise risk in terms of possible negative outcomes, rather than chance probabilities as posited by classic economic theory (i.e., [3]). In keeping with this view, some works (e.g., [4, 5, 6]) have shown that the risk dimension encompasses a 'strong fear' of losses, characterized by lack of control. Decision makers’ self-regulatory orientation may play a relevant role in understanding human behavior

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call