Abstract
High quality financial information depends on the effectiveness of regulators charged with ensuring compliance with financial reporting regulation. We use the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing review process as a setting to test whether individual regulators’ prior involvement (i.e., review team continuity) is associated with the quality of their decision-making. Although continuity may allow regulators to develop valuable knowledge to improve their decision-making, our results are more consistent with continuity leading to lower-quality reviews. Specifically, we find that review team continuity is associated with shorter reviews that ask fewer questions related to authoritative guidance or materially deficient areas, are more similar to the prior review, and are less likely to elicit an acknowledgement that the firm will change their filings. Our inferences are robust to using SEC staff turnover as an instrument for continuity. Overall, our results suggest new team members may provide a fresh perspective.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
