Abstract
The acceleration of economic development in Indonesia cannot be separated when the government implements a Special Economic Zone (KEK) policy by using legal instruments in it. The purpose of this study is to examine the harmonization of regulations related to the proposal and determination of SEZ in Indonesia. This study uses normative legal research, using primary and secondary legal materials. First analysis, the provisions of business entities as proposers for SEZ need to be reviewed because they have a cumulative meaning. Second, private business entities proposing SEZ need to be limited, especially in important areas relating to the life of the wider community. Third, the determination of SEZ by the government (Article) needs to pay attention to RTRW, protected forest areas, and / or analysis of environmental impacts. Fourth, stipulation without a proposal stage is contrary to the principle of kinship. Fifth, Article 8 of the UU KEK is inconsistent with the PP on the Implementation of SEZ and the 2011 Minister of Coordinating Ministry for Guidelines for SEZ Proposals. Sixth, the SEZ proposal by the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education needs to be scrutinized and analyzed in depth in the process of its determination.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
