Abstract
The Republic of Slovenia transposed its obligations outlined in Directive 2008/98 to the Environmental Protection Act through a legal order. Its first unlawful waste disposal regime was implemented in 2008. The responsibility for unlawful waste disposal is primarily placed on the polluter, while the subsidiary responsibility lies with the real estate owner. The owner of the real estate on which the waste is unlawfully disposed must arrange for proper disposal of the waste at his own expense if ordered by the inspection authority. The subsidiary responsibility of the real estate owner implies strong interference with the right to the property. To date, the Constitutional Court has not yet assessed the compatibility of this measure with the Constitution, as it has taken the view that it will not carry out an abstract assessment but will only make a decision through a constitutional appeal procedure. Despite several concerns, the regulations were maintained in the new Environmental Protection Act of 2022. In addition to the unlawful disposal of waste, this Act also regulates the legal consequences of littering; further, the Act imposes relatively high administrative fines, including on any landowner who fails to exercise his secondary responsibility. Notably, the unlawful disposal of waste is defined as a criminal offence that burdens and destroys the environment. The legal framework, in my opinion, fully meets the requirements of Article 36 of Directive 2008/98/EC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law = Agrár- és Környezetjog
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.