Regulation of substance P is similar to that of vasoactive intestinal peptide after axotomy or explantation of the rat superior cervical ganglion.

Abstract

The regulation of the expression of substance P (SP) in the rat superior cervical ganglion was compared to that of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in vivo after axotomy and in vitro after explantation. Previous studies have demonstrated that both neuropeptides increase after explantation, depolarization, and decentralization; however, whereas VIP expression increases after postganglionic axotomy, SP expression reportedly does not. To compare the effect of axotomy on these two peptides directly, the content of both was determined in individual ganglia at various times after surgery. The level of VIP-like immunoreactivity (IR) is increased at 2 days, reaches a peak at 6 days, and then declines by 14 days to approximately half its peak value. The level of SP-IR also increases 2 days after axotomy, but returns to control values by day 6. The increase in SP-IR is accompanied by an increase in beta-preprotachykinin mRNA, suggesting that the elevation in SP content is due, at least in part, to enhanced peptide synthesis. Immunocytochemical localization of SP-IR revealed the presence of immunoreactive principal neurons in axotomized, but not in sham-operated ganglia. Similarities in the regulation of these two neuropeptides were also investigated in organ culture by examining the effects of dexamethasone and interleukin-1 beta on VIP content, since the former has been shown to prevent the increase in SP in culture, while the latter has been found to enhance this increase (Kessler, Adler, Bell, et al., 1983, Neuroscience 9:309-321; Freidin and Kessler, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3200-3203; Hart, Shadiack, and Jonakait, 1991, J. Neurosci. Res. 29:282-291). As with SP expression, dexamethasone reduces the increase in VIP expression, while interleukin-1 beta increases it. Thus, both in vivo and in vitro, similar changes in VIP and SP expression are observed following a number of experimental manipulations, suggesting that expression of the two peptides is regulated by qualitatively similar mechanisms in sympathetic neurons.