Abstract

Literature has shown that failures in the ability to down-regulate negative emotions are the core substrate of anxiety disorders. Previous studies have investigated this issue by encouraging individuals to voluntarily change how they think about a situation in order to decrease its emotional impact. The majority of studies has demonstrated that explicit instructions to reduce negative affect in anxious individuals are usually ineffective. Thus, the goal of the present study was to investigate whether an implicit regulation strategy would modulate electrophysiological activity (Late Positive Potential) associated to affective picture viewing. The Late Positive Potential (LPP) is a sustained positive deflection in the event-related potential that is larger following the presentation of emotional compared to neutral visual stimuli. Participants (low trait anxious - LTA and high trait anxious - HTA individuals) performed an attention task (bar orientation discrimination) while emotional distractive pictures were presented. The task was performed in two different contexts: in the Real context, participants were informed that the distractive pictures had been obtained from real life situations, whereas in the Fictitious context they were told that the pictures had been obtained from movie scenes. In this vein, we encouraged participants to change how they appraised the pictures. Results showed that HTA individuals exhibited larger Late Positive Potential (LPPs) when mutilation pictures were presented in the Real context. Importantly, during the Fictitious one (regulation strategy) the LPP was reduced even in HTA individuals, emphasizing its importance to psychotherapeutic interventions. The present results indicate that HTA individuals are susceptible to modifications in affective contexts.

Highlights

  • The disrupting effects of threatening material in the allocation of attention represents one of the strongest neuropsychological correlates of anxiety disorders (Fox, Russo, Bowles & Dutton, 2001; Koster, Crombez, Verscuere, Van & Wiersema, 2006; Mogg & Bradley, 1998; Williams, Mathews & MacLeod, 1996), reflecting an attention bias to threat

  • Reaction time within each emotional context was not modulated by anxiety trait

  • We observed that high trait anxious (HTA) individuals were able to diminish the emotional impact of unpleasant stimuli by means of two combined emotion regulation strategies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The disrupting effects of threatening material in the allocation of attention represents one of the strongest neuropsychological correlates of anxiety disorders (Fox, Russo, Bowles & Dutton, 2001; Koster, Crombez, Verscuere, Van & Wiersema, 2006; Mogg & Bradley, 1998; Williams, Mathews & MacLeod, 1996), reflecting an attention bias to threat. Several authors have suggested that the attentional system of anxious individuals may be abnormally sensitive to threat-related stimuli, leading to a Previous studies, in non clinical samples, have demonstrated that affective processing depends on several factors, including attention and cognitive modulation (Erthal et al, 2005; Ochsner et al, 2004; Ochsner & Gross, 2005; Oliveira et al, 2009; Pessoa, Padmala & Morland, 2005). Cognitively changing the meaning of emotional stimuli affects evoked responses in the amygdala and other brain areas (Ochsner et al, 2004; Ochsner & Gross, 2005). Results from fMRI studies suggest that instructions to diminish responses to unpleasant images results in decreased amygdala activity, whereas instructions to enhance responses results in increased amygdala activity (Ochsner et al, 2004; Phan et al, 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.