Abstract

Double-strand breaks are one of the most deleterious DNA lesions. Their repair via error-prone mechanisms can promote mutagenesis, loss of genetic information, and deregulation of the genome. These detrimental outcomes are significant drivers of human diseases, including many cancers. Mutagenic double-strand break repair also facilitates heritable genetic changes that drive organismal adaptation and evolution. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of various error-prone DNA double-strand break repair processes and the cellular conditions that regulate them, with a focus on alternative end joining. We provide examples that illustrate how mutagenic double-strand break repair drives genome diversity and evolution. Finally, we discuss how error-prone break repair can be crucial to the induction and progression of diseases such as cancer.

Highlights

  • DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly dangerous lesions that arise with surprising frequency

  • A highly inaccurate form of DSB repair named alternative end joining occurs mainly during S/G2. This cell cycle preference can be explained by the observation that both homologous recombination (HR) and alt-EJ require resection to form single-stranded DNA, a process that is upregulated in S/G2 [3]

  • MMEJ-induced deletions range from a few base pairs to several kilobases polymerase theta, which has been shown to contribute to a majority of alt-EJ in organisms that have of DNA [23,24], while in mammalian cells MMEJ typically results in shorter deletions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly dangerous lesions that arise with surprising frequency. A highly inaccurate form of DSB repair named alternative end joining (alt-EJ) occurs mainly during S/G2 This cell cycle preference can be explained by the observation that both HR and alt-EJ require resection to form single-stranded DNA, a process that is upregulated in S/G2 [3]. Alt-EJ is associated with the generation of genomic diversity at sites prone to DSB formation and can facilitate cellular and organismal adaptation [4] It is a driver of human disease and is associated with poor cancer prognosis [5,6,7]. We conclude by providing selected examples of how error-prone DNA repair promotes genetic diversity in different contexts and may act to drive genome evolutionary processes at both the cellular and organismal levels

Types of Inaccurate Double-Strand Break Repair
Alternative End-Joining: A Quick and Dirty Fix
A Quick and Dirty Fix
Alt-EJand canthe be Defined by Repair
Alt-EJ Can be Defined by Genetic Requirements
The Mechanism of TMEJ
When Homologous Recombination “Goes off the Rails”
Break-Induced Replication
Single-Strand Annealing
Factors That Affect Repair Pathway Choice
Resection
Microhomology
How Error-Prone Repair Relates to Genome Evolution
Alt-EJ Promotes Genome Evolution
Genome Compaction
Genome Expansion
Error-Prone Repair Contributes to Genome Evolution in Cancer
Genome Rearrangements
Chromothripsis
Repair Pathway Choice in the Context of Genome Editing
Findings
Conclusions and Remaining Questions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call