Abstract

Previous studies have reported the failure of cognitive emotion regulation (CER), especially in regulating unpleasant emotions under stress. The underlying reason for this failure was the application of CER depends heavily on the executive function of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), but this function can be impaired by stress-related neuroendocrine hormones. This observation highlights the necessity of developing self-regulatory strategies that require less top-down cognitive control. Based on traditional Chinese philosophy and medicine, which examine how different types of emotions promote or counteract one another, we have developed a novel emotion regulation strategy whereby one emotion is used to alter another. For example, our previous experiment showed that sadness induction (after watching a sad film) could reduce aggressive behavior associated with anger [i.e., “sadness counteracts anger” (SCA)] (Zhan et al., 2015). Relative to the CER strategy requiring someone to think about certain cognitive reappraisals to reinterpret the meaning of an unpleasant situation, watching a film or listening to music and experiencing the emotion contained therein seemingly requires less cognitive effort and control; therefore, this SCA strategy may be an alternative strategy that compensates for the limitations of cognitive regulation strategies, especially in stressful situations. The present study was designed to directly compare the effects of the CER and SCA strategy in regulating anger and anger-related aggression in stressful and non-stressful conditions. Participants’ subjective feeling of anger, anger-related aggressive behavior, skin conductance, and salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase levels were measured. Our findings revealed that acute stress impaired one’s ability to use CR to control angry responses provoked by others, whereas stress did not influence the efficiency of the SCA strategy. Compared with sadness or neutral emotion induction, CER induction was found to reduce the level of subjective anger more, but this difference only existed in non-stressful conditions. By contrast, irrespective of stress, the levels of aggressive behavior and related skin conductance after sadness induction were both significantly lower than those after CER induction or neutral emotion induction, thus suggesting the immunity of the regulatory effect of SCA strategy to the stress factor.

Highlights

  • Previous studies have suggested that cognitive reappraisal successfully down-regulates anger by reframing individuals’ interpretations of an angry situation or event

  • Because the stress scale in our study was reverse scored, these results indicate that the stress manipulation was successful at increasing individuals’ subjective feelings of stress

  • Regarding the significant interaction among time, stress state and regulation strategy, a simple effect analysis focusing on the time differences showed that no differences were found in the non-stress condition for all groups; in stress condition, the cortisol levels after stress induction were significantly higher than those at baseline for all groups, which indicates that the stress manipulation successfully increased cortisol levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous studies have suggested that cognitive reappraisal successfully down-regulates anger by reframing individuals’ interpretations of an angry situation or event. Recent studies have begun to reveal the underlying reason that negative emotions such as anger or fear are so difficult to regulate. These studies suggest that stress destroys the function of cognitive regulation. Raio et al (2013) suggested that the successful implementation of cognitive ER relies on the advanced function of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which might be damaged by the deleterious effects of stress. Catecholamines (e.g., norepinephrine) and cortisol-release activated by stress might impair the cognitive functions of the PFC, thereby undermining cognitive regulation (Raio et al, 2013). ER strategies that are less reliant on the PFC might be more suitable than normal down-regulating strategies (e.g., cognitive reappraisals) with regard to changing negative responses to emotional arousal under stress

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call