Abstract

Treating breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) is challenging. Na+/I− symporter (NIS) expression in BCBMs would permit their selective targeting with radioiodide (131I−). We show impressive enhancement of tumor response by combining131I− with gemcitabine (GEM), a cytotoxic radiosensitizer. Nude mice mammary fat-pad (MFP) tumors and BCBMs were generated with braintropic MDA-MB-231Br cells transduced with bicistronically-linked NIS and firefly luciferase cDNAs. Response was monitored in vivo via bioluminescent imaging and NIS tumor expression.131I−/GEM therapy inhibited MFP tumor growth more effectively than either agent alone. BCBMs were treated with: high or low-dose GEM (58 or 14.5 mg/Kg×4); 131I− (1mCi or 2×0.5 mCi 7 days apart); and 131I−/GEM therapy. By post-injection day (PID) 25, 82-86% of controls and 78-83% of 131I−-treated BCBM grew, whereas 17% low-dose and 36% high-dose GEM regressed. The latter tumors were smaller than the controls with comparable NIS expression (~20% of cells). High and low-dose 131I−/GEM combinations caused 89% and 57% tumor regression, respectively. High-dose GEM/131I− delayed tumor growth: tumors increased 5-fold in size by PID45 (controls by PID18). Although fewer than 25% of cells expressed NIS, GEM/131I− caused dramatic tumor regression in NIS-transduced BCBMs. This effect was synergistic, and supports the hypothesis that GEM radiosensitizes cells to 131I−.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) are challenging to treat, and the prognosis for affected patients is poor relative to that of patients with metastases elsewhere [1, 2]

  • Na+/I- symporter (NIS) expression was demonstrated in MDCK and MDA-MB-231Br cells that were stably transduced with a lentiviral vector containing NIS cDNA linked via a bicistronic cassette to firefly luciferase 2 (Fluc2) cDNA, under the CMV promoter (NIS-IRES-LUC=NIL)

  • NIS-mediated radioiodide transport has been the centerpiece of diagnostic tests and ablative interventions in well-differentiated thyroid cancers for over 65 years [5, 25, 26]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) are challenging to treat, and the prognosis for affected patients is poor relative to that of patients with metastases elsewhere [1, 2]. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement occurs in a significant proportion of patients with triple negative [TN, (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-negative)] and HER2+ metastatic subtypes. Systemic therapies are less successful in the CNS than at other metastatic sites. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) has been thought to impair the entry of cytotoxic, hormonal, and biological agents, providing one explanation for their limited activity against BCBMs. the difficulty of achieving and sustaining optimal concentrations of drugs is likely compounded by rapid drug efflux [3]. For patients with BCBMs, surgical resection and radiation therapy continue to be the most successful therapeutic interventions, but are associated with debilitating neurological and neurocognitive deficits

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call