Abstract

Abstract A fundamental cause of the global financial crisis was excessive maturity mismatch, notably shadow banking holdings of sub-prime MBS and other structured credit instruments and crossborder Euro area interbank lending to the uncompetitive Euro area periphery. The costs of short term funding do not fully reflect underlying asset risks and this created systemic liquidity and credit risks. This externality can be controlled through the issue of tradable licenses for short term funding. This is a simpler and more efficient way of addressing systemic liquidity risk than the controls on individual institutions proposed by international regulators.

Highlights

  • Amongst the most fundamental changes are some of those yet to be implemented: the introduction of global liquidity regulation as part of Basel III, through the imposition of the ‘Liquidity Coverage Ratio’ or LCR and the ‘Net Stable Funding Ratio’ or NSFR;2 and the recent proposals for oversight of shadow banking proposed by the Financial Stability Board

  • This paper suggests a comprehensive registration of assets and liabilities, which can be used to monitor the extent of aggregate maturity mismatch and its contribution to systemic liquidity risks

  • This paper proposes registration of short term liabilities as a means for monitoring systemic liquidity risk, with an incentive for comprehensive registration imposed by giving a right of rollover to all unregistered short term borrowing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper proposes the creation of national (currency specific) registers of short term monetary and money-like liabilities, and the use of these registers to control the aggregate amount of maturity mismatch in the financial system. It will be relatively low cost because the creation of a short-term liability register is something that will likely be needed anyway, in order to fulfil the commitment of policy makers and regulatory authorities to ensure that financial institutions issuing short-term liabilities can be resolved without tax-payer support. It has relatively low compliance costs because of the flexibility offered by ‘cap and trade’ to individual institutions.

The Proposed Mechanism
Registration
Cap and Trade
Registration is a Necessity
Cap and Trade Can Help Restrain Credit Booms
Cap and Trade is Less Costly than Basel III Liquidity Proposals
Practical Concerns and Business Impact
Will the System Work?
Business Impact
Related Ideas and Policy Initiatives
Measures to Increase Transparency and Data Availability
New Regulations to Contain Systemic Financial Risk
Pigovian Taxes
Structural Reform of the Banking Sector
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.