Abstract
Introduction. International experience shows that social innovation is an important tool for regional development, although this type of innovation is a relatively new phenomenon for Russia. On the basis of the research conducted, the article analyzes the conditions for the implementation of social innovation which has a significant potential to meet the challenges of territorial development. Materials and Methods. Based on materials from open sources, as well as on an expert survey conducted by the Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the direct participation of the author, the conditions for the implementation of social innovation prevailing in the constituent entities of the Northwestern Federal District of the Russian Federation were analyzed in the context of legal, infrastructural, economic, and socio-cultural components. Using the results of the expert survey, a quantitative assessment of the level of development of the conditions for the implementation of social innovation was given. The main barriers preventing the reproduction of social innovation within the territory under consideration were revealed. Results. The study has revealed that in the regions of the Northwestern Federal District the conditions for the implementation of social innovation are at the stage of active development: infrastructure and legislation are being formed; financial, tax and property support is being provided; educational programs are being implemented. The study has also shown that there are a number of problematic aspects associated with the underdevelopment of the regulatory framework, with the lack of Centers for innovation in the social sphere in a number of constituent entities, with the limited availability of some financial instruments, with low social and innovative activity of people, etc. Discussion and Conclusion. The results obtained are supported by other studies, which substantiates the need for policy adjustment towards improving the relevant regulatory framework, economic conditions, infrastructure, and socio-cultural environment. The research materials can be used by regional authorities when making managerial decisions to support social innovation; they can also be useful for further studies within the framework of the issues under consideration.
Highlights
International experience shows that social innovation is an important tool for regional development, this type of innovation is a relatively new phenomenon for Russia
Its key factor is innovation, which, in turn, is determined by the availability of sufficient amount of human capital, it being a set of knowledge, skills and abilities, including the ability of a person to generate ideas, create innovations, and bring them to production
The theoretical foundations of the study include the works of Russian and foreign academic economists, generalization and critical analysis of which made it possible to show the indirect impact of human capital on sustainable development
Summary
The factors in the liquidation orientation of the institution of insolvency in the Russian Federation, as well as the trends in the increase in duration of insolvency proceedings with a minimum number of satisfied creditor claims have been identified; counterarguments have been presented regarding the alleged low efficiency of trustees in bankruptcy; arguments concerning the annual increase in the workload of trustees in bankruptcy have been statistically supported. 126 Федерального закона «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)»); б) препятствование проведению инвентаризации; в) обжалование результатов оценки, обращение в арбитражный суд с заявлениями о разрешении разногласий в части порядка реализации имущества должника; г) включение аффилированных лиц в реестр требований кредиторов должника с целью аккумулирования большинства голосов для контроля над процедурой; д) попытки приостановления торгов, оспаривание результатов торгов, жалобы в Федеральную антимонопольную службу Российской Федерации; е) жалобы на действия арбитражного управляющего, давление на него посредством подачи жалоб в Управление Росреестра с целью отстранения от процедуры или же полной дисквалификации управляющего; ‒ величина и разнородность конкурсной массы, что приводит к необходимости организации нескольких длительных процедур торгов; ‒ комплексный и ресурсозатратный характер деятельности арбитражного управляющего по оспариванию подозрительных сделок должника с последующей реализацией возвращенных в конкурсную массу активов или прав требования к третьим лицам; ‒ юридической работой по привлечению к субсидиарной ответственности контролирующих лиц должника. Результаты исследования представляют интерес для арбитражных управляющих, специалистов, сопровождающих процедуры банкротства, а также студентов факультетов экономического и юридического профилей, поскольку включают в себя не только обширный статистический анализ эффективности института несостоятельности в его действующем состоянии, но и сравнительный анализ законопроекта изменений в Федеральный закон «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)» с точки зрения профессионального положения арбитражных управляющих.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have