Abstract
This essay explores the extent to which works published in the RVN between 1954 and 1975 constituted a coherent body of scholarship. Through a case study of the ways in which scholars represented the nam tiến in the journals of the DRV and the RVN, it makes an argument for using regionalism as an interpretive framework through which to examine the latent coherence in RVN scholarship. Particular attention is devoted to tracing the legacy of Nguyễn Dynasty historiography in important RVN publications, such as Tập San Sử Địa, Báo Bách Khoa, and Việt Nam Khảo Cổ Tập San.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
