Abstract

Abstract. Robust and reliable water-resource mapping in ungauged basins requires estimation of the uncertainties in the hydrologic model, the regionalisation method, and the observational data. In this study we investigated the use of regionalised flow-duration curves (FDCs) for constraining model predictive uncertainty, while accounting for all these uncertainty sources. A water balance model was applied to 36 basins in Central America using regionally and globally available precipitation, climate and discharge data that were screened for inconsistencies. A rating-curve analysis for 35 Honduran discharge stations was used to estimate discharge uncertainty for the region, and the consistency of the model forcing and evaluation data was analysed using two different screening methods. FDCs with uncertainty bounds were calculated for each basin, accounting for both discharge uncertainty and, in many cases, uncertainty stemming from the use of short time series, potentially not representative for the modelling period. These uncertain FDCs were then used to regionalise a FDC for each basin, treating it as ungauged in a cross-evaluation, and this regionalised FDC was used to constrain the uncertainty in the model predictions for the basin. There was a clear relationship between the performance of the local model calibration and the degree of data set consistency – with many basins with inconsistent data lacking behavioural simulations (i.e. simulations within predefined limits around the observed FDC) and the basins with the highest data set consistency also having the highest simulation reliability. For the basins where the regionalisation of the FDCs worked best, the uncertainty bounds for the regionalised simulations were only slightly wider than those for a local model calibration. The predicted uncertainty was greater for basins where the result of the FDC regionalisation was more uncertain, but the regionalised simulations still had a high reliability compared to the locally calibrated simulations and often encompassed them. The regionalised FDCs were found to be useful on their own as a basic signature constraint; however, additional regionalised signatures could further constrain the uncertainty in the predictions and may increase the robustness to severe data inconsistencies, which are difficult to detect for ungauged basins.

Highlights

  • Knowledge about the temporal and spatial variability of water resources is essential for effective management of these resources, for preventing water-related disasters, and for fostering cooperation and avoiding conflict over transboundary waters

  • flow-duration curves (FDCs) with uncertainty bounds were calculated for each basin, accounting for both discharge uncertainty and, in many cases, uncertainty stemming from the use of short time series, potentially not representative for the modelling period

  • The analysis of discharge uncertainty for the 35 Honduran stations showed that five stations had most medium to highflow residuals in the range ±10 % of the discharge calculated from the official curves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge about the temporal and spatial variability of water resources is essential for effective management of these resources, for preventing water-related disasters, and for fostering cooperation and avoiding conflict over transboundary waters. Mapping of this variability requires hydrologic models in situations where: (1) discharge data are of insufficient quality, (2) predictions are required for time periods with no monitored discharge, or (3) predictions are required for basins without discharge monitoring stations. In this study we addressed uncertainties in the observational data, the hydrological model parameterisation and the regionalisation method (based on regionalised flowduration curves, FDCs)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call