Abstract

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) acquisitions provide piecemeal coverage across the western US, as collections are organized by local managers of individual project areas. In this study, we analyze different factors that can contribute to developing a regional strategy to use information from completed ALS data acquisitions and develop maps of multiple forest attributes in new ALS project areas in a rapid manner. This study is located in Oregon, USA, and analyzes six forest structural attributes for differences between: (1) synthetic (i.e., not-calibrated), and calibrated predictions, (2) parametric linear and semiparametric models, and (3) models developed with predictors computed for point clouds enclosed in the areas where field measurements were taken, i.e., “point-cloud predictors”, and models developed using predictors extracted from pre-rasterized layers, i.e., “rasterized predictors”. Forest structural attributes under consideration are aboveground biomass, downed woody biomass, canopy bulk density, canopy height, canopy base height, and canopy fuel load. Results from our study indicate that semiparametric models perform better than parametric models if no calibration is performed. However, the effect of the calibration is substantial in reducing the bias of parametric models but minimal for the semiparametric models and, once calibrations are performed, differences between parametric and semiparametric models become negligible for all responses. In addition, minimal differences between models using point-cloud predictors and models using rasterized predictors were found. We conclude that the approach that applies semiparametric models and rasterized predictors, which represents the easiest workflow and leads to the most rapid results, is justified with little loss in accuracy or precision even if no calibration is performed.

Highlights

  • Forest fires and carbon accounting are tightly interrelated areas of interest with critical importance for sustainable forest management [1,2]

  • To analyze differences due to the modeling technique we used error metrics computed after performing the corresponding calibration

  • For the comparisons of models using rasterized and point-cloud airborne laser scanning (ALS) predictors, error metrics were computed after performing the corresponding calibration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest fires and carbon accounting are tightly interrelated areas of interest with critical importance for sustainable forest management [1,2]. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program [6], are able to provide accurate estimates of different forest attributes for large territories such as states or counties using only ground data [7]; that level of spatial detail is too coarse to be used in stand-level forest management problems or in fire-behavior simulations. Prediction of forest attributes using remotely sensed auxiliary information allows obtaining cartographic products with fine resolution with fine resolution, in the range of 10 to 30 m, that can be used in a wide array of forest-management scenarios. Airborne laser scanning (ALS) or airborne LIDAR data provide auxiliary information that is highly correlated with a number of forest structural attributes such as above-ground biomass (AGB), total standing volume, basal area, dominant height, diameter distributions, tree-height distributions, and diversity indexes [8,9,10]. ALS data have been used to reliably predict forest fuel attributes that can be used as inputs to fire-spread models [18,19,20]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call