Abstract

The sustainable supply of raw materials to an expanding global population and rising consumption requires novel governance approaches. Such approaches have recently come to include the topic of ‘minerals safeguarding’. In Austria, the objective of minerals safeguarding has translated into an internationally recognised policy instrument, the Austrian Raw Materials Plan. Our paper investigates how the novel policy approach of safeguarding is translated into provincial and regional land use planning policy in Austria. Following a comparative approach of nine Austrian provinces via document analysis and interviews with policy makers, the analysis indicates diverse forms of implementation: We identify different degrees of uptake and implementation in land use planning policy across goals, instruments and mechanisms. Given the limited amount of research about safeguarding, this paper contributes to a broader understanding of safeguarding practices in public policy (goals, process and instruments), offers insights of’ strong, mixed, and soft’ safeguarding approaches, and provides input for a conceptual model of safeguarding. Our study highlights the importance of political agenda setting for the deployment of land use planning instruments, the need for coordination and communication (between and amongst different levels of government) in the policy process, and a need to assess effectiveness of safeguarding policies.

Highlights

  • Due to the fact that minerals play an important role for the European economy, there are new approaches on how to guarantee their secure and sustainable supply (European Commission, 2013)

  • Several initiatives launched at the European Union (EU) and EU Member States (MS) levels indicate that the approach taken towards minerals safeguarding is receiving increased political salience

  • This paper reflects critically on the implementation process followed to safeguard so-called landowner raw-materials in land-use planning (LUP) and mineral policy, through a detailed examination of the Austrian Raw Materials Strategy (AMS) of 2002 and the Austrian Mineral Resources Plan (AMRP) of 2010 (BMNT, 2019; Holnsteiner et al, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the fact that minerals play an important role for the European economy (e.g. manufacturing of environmental technologies to tackle climate change), there are new approaches on how to guarantee their secure and sustainable supply (European Commission, 2013). Several initiatives launched at the European Union (EU) and EU Member States (MS) levels indicate that the approach taken towards minerals safeguarding is receiving increased political salience. Ali et al (2017) and others (Endl, 2017; Henckens et al, 2019, 2016) argue that there is a need to better integrate different policy fields to sustainably manage mineral resources. In this regard, mineral resource governance is embedded in two policy fields: mineral policy and spatial- or LUP policy. We investigate the discourse on safeguarding from the perspective of LUP and mineral policy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.