Abstract

Any transition to a market economy in the former Soviet Union must take into account the legacy from central planning. Part of this legacy is a socio-economic spatial arrangement not at all compatible with a market economy, an arrangement not easily changed, and one that will affect the outcome of the transition for many decades. Using Western approaches in Russia or the other republics will have very different consequences than they have had in the West. To demonstrate this point, the spatial aspects of three socio-economic processes—urbanization, migration, and privatization—are considered. Some special problems of the current situation and of future development of spatial hierarchies in the former republics are also discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.