Regional flood frequency analysis: comparison of L-moment and conventional approaches for an Indian catchment

Abstract

A realistic estimation of flood magnitude for a given return period is essential for successful operation and economical design of pivotal hydraulic structures such as dams, reservoirs and spillways, bridges, small culverts, urban drainage systems, flood plain zoning, economic evaluation of flood protection projects, etc. The flood frequency analysis is generally used for flood estimation, entirely based on the assumption that the floods are random and the floods in future are supposed to bear similar statistical properties that have occurred in the past. If adequate data are available at-site flood frequency analysis is used, otherwise regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA) is preferred for flood estimation. The RFFA for various small and medium catchments of India with different approaches have been carried out and reported in the literature. The focus of the present study is to carry out the RFFA using different approaches i.e. conventional method and L-moment and comparing the results for the Krishna and Penner subzone 3(h) of India. It was found that the values of growth factors obtained by the conventional method are higher than those of L-moment methods, thus leading to conservative estimate of the peak floods.