Abstract

BackgroundAVAGAST was an international, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. We performed exploratory analyses to evaluate regional differences observed in the trial.MethodsAnalyses were performed in the placebo plus chemotherapy arm (intention-to-treat population). Chemotherapy was cisplatin 80 mg/m2 for six cycles plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally bid days 1–14) or 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day continuous IV infusion days 1–5) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.ResultsOverall, 387 patients were assigned to placebo plus chemotherapy (eastern Europe/South America, n = 118; USA/western Europe, n = 81; Korea/other Asia, n = 94; Japan, n = 94). At baseline, poor performance status, liver metastases, and larger tumors were most frequent in eastern Europe/South America and least frequent in Japan. Patients received subsequent chemotherapy after disease progression as follows: eastern Europe/South America (14%); USA/western Europe (37%); Korea/other Asia (61%); and Japan (77%). Hazard ratios for overall survival versus USA/western Europe were 1.47 (95% CI, 1.09–1.99) for eastern Europe/South America, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67–1.25) for Korea/other Asia, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.64–1.19) for Japan.ConclusionsRegional differences in the healthcare environment may have contributed to the differences in overall survival observed in the AVAGAST study.

Highlights

  • Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and its incidence shows wide variation among geographic regions

  • A total of 387 patients were assigned to the placebo plus chemotherapy arm, of which 81 patients were enrolled from USA/western Europe, 118 patients from eastern Europe/ South America, 94 patients from Korea and other locations in Asia, and 94 patients from Japan

  • An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or 2, the presence of liver metastases, and a maximum tumor size ≥ 40 mm were observed most frequently in patients enrolled from eastern Europe/South America and least often in patients from Japan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and its incidence shows wide variation among geographic regions. In pre-planned subgroup analyses, it was evident that efficacy outcomes in both treatment arms varied markedly by region, with patients from the Asia–Pacific region showing no survival benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy, in contrast to patients from other regions [4]. AVAGAST was an international, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Results Overall, 387 patients were assigned to placebo plus chemotherapy (eastern Europe/South America, n = 118; USA/western Europe, n = 81; Korea/other Asia, n = 94; Japan, n = 94). Patients received subsequent chemotherapy after disease progression as follows: eastern Europe/South America (14%); USA/western Europe (37%); Korea/other Asia (61%); and Japan (77%). Hazard ratios for overall survival versus USA/ western Europe were 1.47 (95% CI, 1.09–1.99) for eastern Europe/South America, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67–1.25) for Korea/ other Asia, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.64–1.19) for Japan. Conclusions Regional differences in the healthcare environment may have contributed to the differences in overall survival observed in the AVAGAST study

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.