Abstract
Isolates of the citrus brown rot pathogens Phytophthora citrophthora and P. syringae from the Inland Empire (IE) and Ventura Co. (VE) regions of southern California were evaluated for their sensitivity to ethaboxam, fluopicolide, mandipropamid, and oxathiapiprolin, and the previously published baselines that were generated for Central Valley (CV) isolates of California were expanded. Fungicides were generally more toxic to CV isolates of both species for all four fungicides. Specific differences were found in the toxicity of ethaboxam to P. syringae where CV isolates on average were 6.8 or 8.2 times more sensitive than those from the VE or IE regions, respectively. Based on the grouping of isolates in an unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram, as well as fastStructure analyses and plotting of principal component analyses (PCAs), differences in ethaboxam sensitivity could be related to differences in genetic background of the isolates. Isolates of P. citrophthora from the IE and VE had slightly reduced (i.e., 1.5×) sensitivity to mandipropamid as compared with isolates from the CV and were found on distinct branches in the UPGMA dendrogram. Differences in genetic background of less sensitive isolates within each species indicate that these two phenotypes emerged multiple times independently. IE and VE isolates of both species were sensitive to mefenoxam. Moderate resistance to potassium phosphite (EC50 values of 25 to 75 μg/ml) was present in IE and VE isolates of P. syringae, whereas some IE isolates of P. citrophthora were considered resistant with EC50 values of up to 113.69 μg/ml. Resistance to potassium phosphite did not relate to distinct genotypes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.