Abstract
Regional variations of the preoperative biometry can affect the refractive accuracy of cataract surgery. We aimed to compare the preoperative biometric data for cataract surgery between two domestic institutions. We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative biometric data of 673 consecutive eyes undergoing standard cataract surgery at Miyata Eye Hospital (Miyazaki; M group) and Kitasato University Hospital (Kanagawa; K group), and compared these data between the two groups. We found significant differences in the mean keratometric readings (44.39 ± 1.56D vs. 44.09 ± 1.74D) (unpaired t test, p = 0.034), the anterior chamber depth (3.14 ± 0.43mm vs. 3.46 ± 0.62mm) (p < 0.001), the axial length (23.98 ± 1.62mm vs. 24.59 ± 1.82mm) (p < 0.001), and the lens thickness (4.64 ± 0.48mm vs. 4.37 ± 0.62mm) (p < 0.001), in the M and K groups, respectively. Otherwise, we found no significant differences in corneal astigmatism (p = 0.104), or central corneal thickness (p = 0.480) between the two groups. For subgroup analysis, the prediction error (0.06 ± 0.47D) in the M group was significantly more hyperopic than that (- 0.09 ± 0.54D) in the K group (p = 0.006). There were significant differences in the mean keratometric readings, the anterior chamber depth, the axial length, and the lens thickness, by approximately 0.3D, 0.3mm, 0.6mm, and 0.3mm, respectively. Regional variations of the preoperative biometry did exist to some extent, and were not clinically negligible, in consideration of the precise IOL power calculation and the subsequent refractive accuracy of cataract surgery. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (000037994).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.