Abstract

A regional climate model is driven at its lateral boundaries by the European Center for Medium Range Forecast (ECMWF) analyses and the GENESIS global climate model (GCM) during the spring and summer of 1988. Observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are imposed as boundary conditions in the GCM. The regional climate simulations are integrated from April 1, 1988 through September 1, 1988 using a horizontal grid spacing of 108 km over the continental United States. The largest differences in both the atmospheric circulation and the surface climate of the regional climate simulations with GCM boundary conditions occur during June of 1988 when compared to the analyses or observations. The primary cause for the different results in the regional climate simulations is the lack of an anomalous upper level circulation in the GCM. In summary, the regional model does not add additional value to the large-scale patterns, which show the same systematic bias as the GCM. However, precipitation in the regional model is closer to observations when compared to the GCM. This implies that the use of an ensemble average to provide boundary conditions in conjunction with improved physics of the regional model may enhance the regional detail that is absent in low resolution GCMs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.