Abstract

Subtotal pancreatectomy (90%) in Lewis rats induces chronic islet inflammation and tissue damage in the remaining pancreas 4 months after surgery. Concomitantly, significant enlargement of the islets of Langerhans was observed (90% pancreatectomy: islet/pancreas area: 25.6 +/- 9.6 x 10(-3), beta-cell/pancreas area: 12.4 +/- 4.4 x 10(-3); n = 4; controls without pancreatectomy: islet/pancreas area: 5.5 +/- 1.7 x 10(-3), beta-cell/pancreas area: 4.6 +/- 1.5 x 10(-3); n = 4; p < 0.05, respectively). Islet growth is mainly due to an increase in beta-cell mass. Beta-cell regeneration was not caused by the surgical manipulations or by metabolic stress. The former was ruled out by performing 10% pancreatectomy which did not cause islet enlargement after 4 months (islet/pancreas area: 13.6 +/- 11.3 x 10(-3), beta-cell/pancreas area: 7.1 +/- 2.0 x 10(-3); n = 3). An influence of metabolic stress was excluded by continuous substitution of syngenic islet antigens, which inhibits insulitis. In the absence of islet inflammation, despite persistent metabolic stress, beta-cell regeneration did not occur (islet/pancreas area: 7.0 +/- 5.5 x 10(-3), beta-cell/pancreas area: 5.5 +/- 4.1 x 10(-3); n = 4). Continuous treatment of animals after 90% pancreatectomy by insulin implants (1.5 U/day) avoided insulitis and beta-cell growth (islet/pancreas area: 9.2 +/- 1.1 x 10(-3), beta-cell/pancreas area: 6.8 +/- 1.0 x 10(-3), n = 3): All enlarged islets observed 4 months after 90% pancreatectomy without further treatment were infiltrated. Thus, beta-cell growth appears to be a response to insulitis. The stimulus for beta-cell growth could result from tissue damage caused by infiltrating cells or from cytokines secreted by the infiltrating cells, or both.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call