Abstract

This article examines how state regulations, market barriers, racist discrimination as well as NGOs interact and create internal border regimes by enabling, as well as restricting, access to social and civil rights connected to housing and the freedom of movement and settlement for refugees. Our contribution builds on an analysis of federal and state regulations on housing for refugees who are either in the process of seeking asylum or have completed the process and have been granted an asylum status in Germany. The analysis aims to dissect the workings of these regulations in order to develop a detailed understanding of how these internal border regimes define barriers and access to social and civil rights. In addition to legal and regulatory barriers at the federal, state, and local levels, we identify several other barriers that affect if, how, and when refugees are able to enter local housing markets. We will examine these barriers based on an exemplary analysis of the situation in the cities of Berlin and Dresden, whereby we will apply concepts from border as well as citizenship studies to obtain a deeper understanding of the processes at hand. While contributions to the realm of border studies have so far mostly concentrated on national or EU borders, our approach follows recent literature that emphasises the need to analyse the workings of borders <em>internal to</em> nation-states but has so far not addressed local variations of the ways in which refugees are able to access their right to housing. In taking up this approach, we also stress the need to look at local dimensions of an increasing civic stratification of refugee rights, which past research has also conceptualised primarily on the national level. In both cities, we have collected administrative documents and conducted interviews with refugees, NGOs, and representatives from the local administration. Based on this material, we analyse the workings of administrative barriers at the state and local levels along with market barriers and discriminatory practices employed by landlords and housing companies at the local level. In most cases, these conditions restrict refugees’ access to housing. We will contrast these obstacles with insight into the strategies pursued by refugees and volunteers in their efforts to find a place to live in the city.

Highlights

  • IntroductionWhen refugees enter the territory of The Federal Republic of Germany and apply for asylum, they are confronted with a number of multi-layered regulations that affect

  • When refugees enter the territory of The Federal Republic of Germany and apply for asylum, they are confronted with a number of multi-layered regulations that affectSocial Inclusion, 2018, Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 135–146 their ability to reside in and move freely around the territory

  • The transition from state-organised accommodation to housing market access is one of several transitions in different realms of civil and social rights that refugees undergo when changing between legal statuses during the asylum-seeking process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When refugees enter the territory of The Federal Republic of Germany and apply for asylum, they are confronted with a number of multi-layered regulations that affect. Social Inclusion, 2018, Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 135–146 their ability to reside in and move freely around the territory. This includes obligations to live and/or be present in specific municipalities and types of accommodation. We will focus on the transition process that refugees undergo from being obliged to live in state-organised forms of mass accommodation to the actual ability to rent their own apartment, and we will examine which factors affect this transition. We identify several layers of internal border regulations that create barriers and access to individual housing, which notably differ across federal states and municipalities. The length of time that refugees are kept waiting (Oldfield & Greyling, 2015) in regard to housing depends, among other things, on the state and municipality to which they are allocated

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.