Abstract
This review article investigates the migration boom of 2015–2016 and highlights EU asylum vulnerabilities. Although it pursues centralisation, the planned Dublin IV raises questions. The use of human rights terminology by Frontex as a means of control shows informal externalisation. Migration restrictions take the stage in crisis management. Research conducted in collaboration reveals Europe's desire for a regulated refugee policy. Laws in Latin America differ from those in the EU in meaningful ways. Defying the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), Finland's crisis reaction demonstrates political and Europeanization tendencies that go beyond Zaun's theory. By highlighting the interaction of national viewpoints, politics, and Europeanization in forming refugee policy, the study advances knowledge of CEAS.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
