Abstract

This essay considers the informal in the work of Howard J. Wiarda, both in his observational approach to research and in the interactions he observed in Washington political society. I contend that Wiarda’s focus on these phenomena was important, although he did not take his analysis of it far enough. In response, I draw upon the literature on informal institutions, policy networks, and social capital to reframe Wiarda’s observations about interactions in Washington in the context of political science, in order to find greater meaning in an important theme in his work. I find that the informal interactions which Wiarda observed in Washington political society, as he asserted, undermine and polarize the U.S. policy-making process, and that they do so because they do not produce the bridging social capital that is expected of heterogeneous social networks.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.