Abstract

There is a widely accepted stereotype that Indigenous Taiwanese have lost their connection to country as a result of colonization and thus the Indigenous presence is often omitted in representations of ‘modern’ Taiwan. By asserting a modern/traditional binary that privileges the colonizer as modern these representations demean Indigenous cultures as ‘primitive’ or ‘traditional’. This paper challenges those biased dichotomies by exploring the experience of Tayal people in northern Taiwan, drawing on both field and archival research to demonstrate the resistant and persistent Indigenous presence in common property resource governance, specifically water governance. The research found that Tayal systems for common property governance persist in the management of water. It also demonstrates that in those governance systems, non-human agencies such as water have active agency in Tayal culture. By recognizing water as actively engaged in the common property governance, the paper argues that governing common property in the Tayal context is about contemporary and adaptive governance relations among non-human and human agencies in a more-than-human world, as well as communally sharing the custodianship. It is misguided to understand these governance systems as primitive, traditional or inauthentic – all common representations within dominant Taiwanese discourses. The paper also argues that recognizing and engaging Tayal people’s communal custodianship offers a foundation for building culturally appropriate, just and resilient common property governance frameworks in Taiwan’s contested cultural landscapes.

Highlights

  • In many settler societies, there is a common and dominant misconception that Aboriginal peoples have lost connection to their traditional territories and values as a result of colonization

  • There is a widely accepted stereotype that Indigenous Taiwanese have lost their connection to country as a result of colonization and the Indigenous presence is often omitted in representations of ‘modern’ Taiwan

  • This paper challenges those biased dichotomies by exploring the experience of Tayal people in northern Taiwan, drawing on both field and archival research to demonstrate the resistant and persistent Indigenous presence in common property resource governance, water governance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a common and dominant misconception that Aboriginal peoples have lost connection to their traditional territories and values as a result of colonization. Dominant discourses that privilege colonization as an unproblematic driver of modernization demean Indigenous cultures as ‘primitive’ or ‘traditional’ – creating a modern/traditional binary that this paper seeks to unsettle. In Taiwan’s ‘modern’ society, there is a widespread stereotype that Indigenous cultures must remain unchanged to be authorized as authentic and recognizable by the Taiwanese state. Like many colonizing societies, Taiwan has, until recently at least, argued that Indigenous culture exists only as a past traditional society – unchanging and unchangeable; anywhere and any-when except the here and now.. On 1st August 2016, President Ing-wen Tsai delivered the National Apology to the Indigenous Taiwanese for historical injustices and proposed transitional justice in a national scheme.. On 1st August 2016, President Ing-wen Tsai delivered the National Apology to the Indigenous Taiwanese for historical injustices and proposed transitional justice in a national scheme.2 This National Apology opens an opportunity for Taiwanese On 1st August 2016, President Ing-wen Tsai delivered the National Apology to the Indigenous Taiwanese for historical injustices and proposed transitional justice in a national scheme. This National Apology opens an opportunity for Taiwanese

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call