Abstract

BackgroundVascular spasm is well known to occur in the arterial system. Central venous spasm during pacemaker implantation is uncommon with only a few cases reported from time to time. Sometimes, the venous spasms may not respond to nitroglycerine injections which requires a change of access site and undue discomfort for the patient.Case presentationA 72-year-old female patient with no prior comorbidities presented to us with recurrent dizziness on exertion and at rest. The electrocardiogram showed complete heart block, likely to be of sclerodegenerative etiology as the patient did not have any ischemic symptoms, also the electrocardiogram and echocardiogram did not show any evidence of ischemia. As part of the hospital protocol, a venogram was performed by giving intravenous diluted contrast (iohexol) through the left brachial vein, which showed good-sized axillary and subclavian veins. We attempted to cannulate the left axillary vein with a 16G needle using Seldinger technique, but the axillary vein could not be cannulated despite multiple attempts. We gave incremental boluses of intravenous nitroglycerine, despite that the left axillary vein could not be cannulated. Repeat intravenous contrast injection showed severe spasm of axillary and subclavian veins. Finally, the axillary vein was cannulated from the right side using anatomical landmarks and a pacemaker was implanted.ConclusionsVenous spasm during device implantation although uncommon, it should be anticipated in patients with difficult cannulation to prevent inadvertent complications like pneumothorax and arterial injuries. Mild venous spasm may relieve with time but severe venous spasm may require a change of access site

Highlights

  • Vascular spasm is well known to occur in the arterial system

  • Venous spasm during device implantation uncommon, it should be anticipated in patients with difficult cannulation to prevent inadvertent complications like pneumothorax and arterial injuries

  • Mild venous spasm may relieve with time but severe venous spasm may require a change of access site

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

Venous spasm during device implantation is an uncommon phenomenon but should be anticipated in patients with difficult cannulation of access vein. Mild venous spasm may relieve spontaneously with time or with the use of nitroglycerin, but a severe venous spasm alters the course of the procedure, and different access sites might be required. Understanding and anticipation of this complication might prevent inadvertent local injuries and other life-threatening complications like pneumothorax, arterial punctures causing bleeding or hematoma

Background
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call