Abstract
Refractoriness to transfusions of platelet concentrates (PC) adversely affects the conduct of complex therapy in hematological patients. Individual selection of platelets is recommended for such patients. In cases of high degree of alloimmunization with the formation of polyspecific antibodies, when individual selection is difficult, procedures plasmapheresis (PPs) is included in the treatment program.Aims: to evaluate the effectiveness of PC transfusions by individual selection in patients refractory to transfusions and the use of PPs as a second line therapy in combination with individual platelet selection.Materials and methods: from September 2015 to December 2017, 91 patients with refractory to PC transfusions from 1263 patients who received PC transfusion were observed in the center’s clinics. The median age was 43 (18–71) years. M/F – 38/53. Patients: 20 – aplastic anemia (AA), 17 – myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 45 – acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 9 – acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). All patients underwent PC transfusion by individual selection (HLA/HPA) Immucor’s Capture-P solid phase technology. In 28 (30 %) of 91 patients, due to the inability to select, there was a need for PP as a second line therapy. Patients: AA – 4 (20 %); MDS – 8 (47 %); AML – 12 (26 %); ALL– 4 (44 %). The median age was 48 (23–71) years. M/F – 8/20. From 2 to 15 procedures were performed (on average – 6) for each patient. All patients received PC transfusions by individual selection by cross-matching immediately after the PP procedure. The efficacy of PC transfusions was assessed by Absolute Platelet Increment (API) and Corrected Count Increment (CCI), relief of hemorrhagic syndrome.Results: in 26 of 28 refractory to PC transfusions patients, in the absence of compatible donor platelets, carrying out PPs in combination with subsequent individual platelet selection promoted relief of hemorrhagic syndrome, increase in API from 3.3 × 109/L at 29.5 × 109/L and CCI from 1.3 to 10.7. Against the background of PPs, combined with individual selection, the degree of alloimmunization (the percentage of incompatible pairs) decreased on average: AA (n = 4) – from 91.7 to 50.2 %; MDS (n = 8) – from 89.6 to 31.6 %; AML (n = 12) – 86.0 to 40.5 % and ALL (n = 4) – from 91.7 to 37.7 %. In 2 patients with a high degree of alloimmunization and after carrying out PPs, it was not possible to select compatible platelets, PC transfusions were ineffective (API = 5 × 109/L, CCI = 1), and hemorrhagic syndrome was not completely managed, but its severity was reduced.Conclusions. With the development of refractoriness to PC transfusions and the ineffectiveness of individual platelet selection, PPs should be used as the second line of therapy, which, combined with individual selection, increases the likelihood of compatible donor-recipient pairs and increases the clinical efficacy of PC transfusions. When PPs is ineffective in combination with individual selection, it is necessary to exclude the syndrome of increased consumption and other mechanisms of refractoriness.
Highlights
Individual selection of platelets is recommended for such patients
Authors' contributions E.A. Mikhaylova, V.V. Troitskaya, A.F. Rakhmani: patient selection for the study; I.V. Dubinkin, A.F. Rakhmani: study design; O.S. Kalmykova: individual platelet selection; O.S. Kalmykova, A.F. Rakhmani: collection of lab data for the study; V.S. Galuzyak, A.F. Rakhmani: plasmapheresis; A.F. Rakhmani, I.V. Dubinkin: data analysis (including statistics); I.V. Dubinkin: literature review; I.V. Dubinkin: article preparation; E.A. Mikhaylova, I.V. Dubinkin, T.V. Gaponova: manuscript editing
Summary
Две последовательные неэффективные трансфузии тромбоцитов, соответствующие стандартам заготовки, совместимые по системе АВ0, со сроком хранения не более 5 сут при АПТ 24
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.