Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near‐ surface inhomogeneities

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe performance of refraction inversion methods that employ the principle of refraction migration, whereby traveltimes are laterally migrated by the offset distance (which is the horizontal separation between the point of refraction and the point of detection on the surface), can be adversely affected by very near‐surface inhomogeneities. Even inhomogeneities at single receivers can limit the lateral resolution of detailed seismic velocities in the refractor.The generalized reciprocal method ‘statics’ smoothing method (GRM SSM) is a smoothing rather than a deterministic method for correcting very near‐surface inhomogeneities of limited lateral extent. It is based on the observation that there are only relatively minor differences in the time‐depths to the target refractor computed for a range of XY distances, which is the separation between the reverse and forward traveltimes used to compute the time‐depth. However, any traveltime anomalies, which originate in the near‐surface, migrate laterally with increasing XY distance. Therefore, an average of the time‐depths over a range of XY values preserves the architecture of the refractor, but significantly minimizes the traveltime anomalies originating in the near‐surface. The GRM statics smoothing corrections are obtained by subtracting the average time‐depth values from those computed with a zero XY value. In turn, the corrections are subtracted from the traveltimes, and the GRM algorithms are then re‐applied to the corrected data. Although a single application is generally adequate for most sets of field data, model studies have indicated that several applications of the GRM SSM can be required with severe topographic features, such as escarpments.In addition, very near‐surface inhomogeneities produce anomalous head‐wave amplitudes. An analogous process, using geometric means, can largely correct amplitude anomalies. Furthermore, the coincidence of traveltime and amplitude anomalies indicates that variations in the near‐surface geology, rather than variations in the coupling of the receivers, are a more likely source of the anomalies.The application of the GRM SSM, together with the averaging of the refractor velocity analysis function over a range of XY values, significantly minimizes the generation of artefacts, and facilitates the computation of detailed seismic velocities in the refractor at each receiver. These detailed seismic velocities, together with the GRM SSM‐corrected amplitude products, can facilitate the computation of the ratio of the density in the bedrock to that in the weathered layer. The accuracy of the computed density ratio improves where lateral variations in the seismic velocities in the weathered layer are known.