Abstract
This research focuses on establishing chemical castration as additional criminal penalty. Chemical castration is intended to minimize sexual crimes against children. However, this additional punishment of chemical castration is conflicted with the ethics of the medical profession and the additional punishment of chemical castration is due to the lack of technical instructions for chemical castration. This is a type of normative legal research. This study concludes that: first, the regulation on the executor of the perpetrator of sexual crimes against children does not have legal certainty. A person who takes action on chemical castration is not only a person who does it, but a person who has knowledge in the field of chemical castration. This science is related to medical science which should be able to perform chemical castration. The act of chemical castration that should be done by a doctor conflicts with the professional code of ethics of a doctor. Second, the legislators must reconstruct the rules related to the implementation of chemical sanctions castration so that they are clearly regulated and do not conflict with other regulations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
