Reforming the coroner and death certification service

Abstract

The intention of the Home Office is to introduce a new system that combines an independent check on all deaths and a professional oversight of death patterns, with, for the majority of cases, the minimum of bureaucracy. No public consultation is intended, so that reforms are not delayed. However as the proposals are developed in the coming months, the details, practicalities and costs will be discussed “with relevant professionals (not defined) and those with experience of the existing arrangements”. The imperfections of the present system are outlined. It is hoped the medical profession will have an input, since statements such as “ ‘hospital post mortems’, which are for medical research and public health protection purposes ” need amendment. There should be a change in perception of the audit value of this procedure to BOTH the family and the treating doctor. Unfortunately it is proposed the new system in total should cost no more than at present . “Professionals” (not defined) will be involved in the financial detail. All deaths, after verification and certification of the medical cause of death (if known) would then be referred to the ‘medical examiner’ based in the coroner's office. He/she would be a qualified doctor employed by the new coroner service and independent of the Health Service. The medical examiner could provide supplementary advice on medical matters required by the coroner. “Retention of tissue should only take place where absolutely necessary and the coroner and his or her other staff should take account of the needs of families and friends carefully throughout the process.” “Coroners could take advice from their medical examiner to ascertain and prescribe the minimum level of invasiveness to establish the cause of death.” This issue is far from resolved, as signified by a recent call from the DoH giving a grant to study the value of MRI versus a full post mortem. No thought is given to systemic diseases, which may present in one organ system or another disease process, other than that causing death. Medical examiners will have to keep abreast of current developments in medicine BUT will be outside the NHS, which could cause problems. Medical examiners will be appointed (with an input from Regional Directors of Public Health) and managed from within the coroner service. They would work closely with the registrar of births and deaths. Deaths from unnatural causes or when the medical cause of death is unknown will result in judicial inquests. The medical examiner will have an input into causes of death and relevant investigations. Details of the proposed structure of the system are given, as well as the investigative and other roles of Coroner's officers. The establishment of medico-legal centres, as “examples of good practice” is advocated. The drawbacks of this system are stressed in this paper. There is at present an on-going review of forensic pathology services and it is hoped thought will be given to the increasing trend for sub-specialisation in medicine.