Abstract

PurposeCountry comparative studies especially in Africa on public procurement reforms toward financial control and accountability of public expenditure are limited. Meanwhile, these kinds of studies have potential for providing useful insights on how value for money through public procurement is being ensured across Africa. This paper attempts to provide this. The purpose of this paper is to highlight several policy recommendations for public management aimed at improving public procurement and public financial management (PFM) systems in Africa.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts a qualitative case study using secondary data drawn from Global Integrity Index (GII) of the Transparency International and the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessments databases to investigate variables that influence public procurement practices in three purposively selected African countries. The comparative approach for presenting some of the experiences of countries in public procurement methods is used in this paper.FindingsThe findings suggest three main variables, namely, government structure and economic variables, complicated by socio-cultural values interact to influence public procurement and PFM systems in the case study countries.Research limitations/implicationsData for the GII indicators used were only available from 2013, which restricted the discussion of those indicators to a short span (2013–2015).Social implicationsThe socio-cultural milieu within which public procurement takes place has implications for how governance structures function to deliver value-for-money public procurement.Originality/valueThis study adds value by comparing three countries within Africa to reveal common variables which influence public procurement and PFM systems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call