Abstract

Since 2015, a “reform storm” of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) opened up in China. This study tries to answer the question of whether these reforms improve the effectiveness of EIA. First, we elaborate on the reforms along with three well-acknowledged components, including EIA legislation, administration, and process. Then, evaluate the reformed EIA system against revised Ahmad and Wood’s criteria. The results demonstrate that the revised laws and regulations are more stringent than the old versions. The EIA process is simplified, and its coordination with the pollutant discharge permit system is promoted. The interim and post-event supervision is currently more robust and the penalties are more severe than before. However, the hierarchical position of the Environmental Protection Law is not high enough and the coordination of different government departments is still challenging. In summary, despite the problems occurring at the initial phase of reforms, the effectiveness of the EIA system has largely been improved.

Highlights

  • As one of the essential preventive environmental protection measures, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been developed in China for more than four decades

  • We elaborate on the reforms along with three well-acknowledged components, including EIA legislation, administration, and process

  • We evaluate the effectiveness of the reformed EIA system against the revised Ahmed and Wood’s criteria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As one of the essential preventive environmental protection measures, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been developed in China for more than four decades. It has evolved into a fairly comprehensive and technically adequate system, there still exist many problems as to its performance [1] [2]. Six severe problems in China’s EIA system were pointed out by the third inspection team organized by the national government in 2015, which include: 1) some developers proceed construction projects before getting EIA approval, 2) some leading cadres and their relatives illegally intervene in the EIA. An EIA “reform storm” opened up and a series of reforms took place

The Reforms on EIA
The Researches on EIA Effectiveness
Research Purpose and Method
Institutional Arrangements for EIA
Legislative Provisions
Administrative Setup
EIA Process
Evaluation of the Reformed EIA System
Legislative provisions
Specified EIA review body
Existence of legislative provisions for appeals
Evaluation of Foundation Measures
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call