Abstract

This article outlines an agenda for critical discourse studies that reserves a place of honour for the notion of reflexivity. It draws on four concepts of reflexivity developed in the social sciences: reflexivity as a general feature of interaction and subjectivity; as a methodological praxis; as a property of discursive and non-discursive systems; and as a key feature of late modernity. Reflexivity is considered in terms of acts of interpretive movement. Social actors, organizations and systems throw reflexive loops around themselves, around others, as well as around spatial, temporal, linguistic, cognitive, social and historical dimensions of contextual reality. All social entities engage in the Sisyphean task of fixing social reality, trying to grasp it with a porous and amorphous semiotic net, shaping interpretive reality in the process. Reflexive loops can leave ripples on the surface of language and communication for others to pick up and engage with. Through metadiscursive acts, interlocutors can then engage with the meanings that fix who and what they are in an unequal and power-infused world whose boundaries can only be imagined through interpretive and critical praxis. Reflexivity is a precondition for the articulation of critique and should be considered as a key concept in the field of discourse studies. This paper is published as part of a collection on discourse studies.

Highlights

  • The phenomenon of reflexivity lies at the heart of many discursive processes and discourse analytical questions

  • Many reflexive functions of language use are discussed under other headers such as intertextuality, interdiscursivity, metadiscourse, metalinguistics or metapragmatics (Hyland, 2005; Titscher et al, 2000: 106; Firth, 2009: 71–73; Verschueren and Brisard, 2009: 33–34; Verschueren, 2011: 183)

  • Reflexive modes of discursive practice are often studied under headers such as articulation (Laclau and Mouffe, 1985), contingency (Butler et al, 2000), dislocation, subjectivity, bio-politics or governmentality (Foucault, 1979,1982, 1989,; Rose, 1998; Rose et al, 2006; Glynos and Stavrakakis, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The phenomenon of reflexivity lies at the heart of many discursive processes and discourse analytical questions. The field emerges as different disciplinary, theoretical and methodological perspectives engage in dialogue and conflict over partially overlapping approaches to language, practice and communication on the one hand (discourse analysis), and power, knowledge and subjectivity on the other hand (discourse theory).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call