Abstract

The neurogenic effect of passive hindlimb movement on phrenic nerve discharge was compared in decorticate unanaesthetized and curarized rabbit preparations prior to and after spinal transection. The question of how and where sensory information has access to the central respiratory network was addressed in each case. All passive motions, performed using a mechanical device, were of constant amplitude in a given preparation. The results clearly differed in decorticate and spinal preparations. In the decorticate vagotomized preparation, periodic passive motions led to an immediate shortening of the respiratory period which lasted throughout the periodic stimulation and stopped with its cessation; it did not depend on the frequency of the natural stimulation and was entirely due to a 20% shortening of the expiration time. Maintained full flexion or full extension both induced the same expiration time shortening, but limited to the first two to three respiratory cycles after onset and interruption of stimulation. After spinal transection at the C2 level and moderate activation with DOPA, no phrenic activity developed in the absence of proprioceptive stimulation. Periodic hindlimb movements evoked simultaneous large bursts in both phrenic nerves during each extension; a 1:1 coordination of phrenic activity with the external imposed period ( P) was observed for various P values. A strong phrenic activation could also be elicited through maintained full hindlimb extension but not through full flexion: this activation appeared as rhythmic discharge as long as extension was maintained. It is concluded that proprioceptive inputs act upon the medullary respiration generator and reset its own rhythm whereas, at the spinal level, they elicit an amplitude modulation at phrenic motoneuronal level without acting upon the rate of the spinal “respiration” generator itself; on the same phrenic motoneurons, a subthreshold central activation added to a subthreshold proprioceptive activation probably accounts for the phrenic bursting during maintained extension. Finally, the proprioceptive control from the hindlimb on phrenic activity is processed at different sites of the central respiratory network at medullary and at spinal level and may depend on different input signals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call