Reflex anal dilatation: An observational study on non-abused children

Abstract

ObjectivesReflex anal dilatation (RAD) is considered as a possible sign of anal abuse,however studies evaluating its prevalence in non-abused children are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of RAD in a convenience sample of children with no suspicion of abuse admitted to a Pediatric Emergency Department (PED). MethodsProspective observational study including children admitted to the PED of Padova, Italy, between January and June 2011. Patients with no suspicion of abuse and for whom ano-genital examination was part of their medical evaluation were included. Children were excluded if in critical clinical conditions or if any suspicion of abuse arose during medical evaluation. Presence/absence of RAD and of factors favoring its appearance were recorded for each patient. ResultsTwo-hundred and thirty children (median age of 12 months, interquartile range 5–35 months) were finally included. A positive RAD was reported in 14 (6.1%, CI 95% 3.4–10). Only 3 patients (1.3%, CI 95% 0.3–3.7) showed a positive RAD in the absence of any predisposing factor. ConclusionsRAD is an infrequent sign in non-abused children and it is particularly rare in the absence of any predisposing factor. Case-control studies are necessary to better clarify its diagnostic relevance.