Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) launched the OneHealth Tool (OHT) to help low and middle income countries to develop their capacities for sector-wide priority setting. In 2016, we sought to use the OHT to aid the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC), the national health insurer of the Philippines, in decisions to expand benefit packages using cost-effectiveness analyses. With technical support from the WHO, we convened health planning officers from the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) and the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PHIC) conduct generalized cost-effective analyses (GCEA) of selected un-financed noncommunicable disease interventions using OHT. We collected epidemiological and cost data through health facility surveys, review of literature such as cost libraries and clinical practice guidelines, and expert consultations. Although we were unable to use GCEA results directly to set policy, we learnt important policy lessons which we outline here that might help inform other countries looking to inform service coverage decisions. Additionally, the entire process and GCEA visualizations helped high-level policymakers in the health sector, who have traditionally relied on ad hoc decision making, to realize the need for a systematic and transparent priority-setting process that can continuously provide the evidence needed to inform service coverage decisions.

Highlights

  • Striving for universal health coverage requires priority setting to maximize health gains from limited resources (Chalkidou et al, 2016)

  • We had insufficient technical capacity to conduct the volume of necessary primary cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) within the timeframe of our policy window

  • We sought the help of the World Health Organization (WHO) to conduct generalized costeffectiveness analysis (GCEA) using their OneHealth Tool (OHT) software

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Striving for universal health coverage requires priority setting to maximize health gains from limited resources (Chalkidou et al, 2016). Keywords priority-setting, low and middle income countries, WHO CHOICE, generalized cost-effectiveness analysis, OneHealth Tool, sector-wide planning This paper documents our subsequent attempt on a more definitive list of interventions using cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) in the Philippine setting.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.