Abstract
Abstract Most planners and land use attorneys are familiar with the debate between private property rights advocates and those dubbed by Professor Daniel Mandelker, FAICP, as police power hawks. While everyone may agree that the U.S. Supreme Court's regulatory takings jurisprudence has been doctrinally incoherent and practically unhelpful, there is a familiar split as to where the Court went wrong and what is to be done about it.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
