Abstract

ABSTRACTThe world population is aging and diseases such as diabetes mellitus and systemic arterial hypertension are increasing the risk of patients developing chronic kidney disease, leading to an increase in the prevalence of patients on dialysis. The expansion of health services has made it possible to offer dialysis treatment to an increasing number of patients. At the same time, dialysis survival has increased considerably in the last two decades. Thus, patients on dialysis are becoming more numerous, older and with greater number of comorbidities. Although dialysis maintains hydroelectrolytic and metabolic balance, in several patients this is not associated with an improvement in quality of life. Therefore, despite the high social and financial cost of dialysis, patient recovery may be only partial. In these conditions, it is necessary to evaluate the patient individually in relation to the dialysis treatment. This implies reflections on initiating, maintaining or discontinuing treatment. The multidisciplinary team involved in the care of these patients should be familiar with these aspects in order to approach the patient and his/her relatives in an ethical and humanitarian way. In this study, we discuss dialysis in the final phase of life and present a systematic way to address this dilemma.

Highlights

  • Following the diagnosis of chronic renal failure, there is a phase of intense treatment, in an attempt to block or reduce its progression to dialytic renal disease

  • There is a defervescence in the measures for primary control of the disease and there is an increase in supportive care or palliative treatment.[1]

  • Perhaps the main and most important is the answer to a question that involves medical and ethical aspects: will dialysis increase the patient’s time and quality of life or prolong the death process?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Following the diagnosis of chronic renal failure, there is a phase of intense treatment, in an attempt to block or reduce its progression to dialytic renal disease. The attempts will be of greater or lesser intensity, according to the disease stage upon presentation. There is a defervescence in the measures for primary control of the disease and there is an increase in supportive care or palliative treatment.[1]

Dialysis in the End of Life
What to consider when dialysis treatment is prescribed
Assessment of the risk of death on dialysis
Treatment options for advanced chronic kidney disease
Palliative care plan
Supportive and spiritual care
Reflections for the physician on the death process
Conservative treatment in chronic kidney disease
Dialytic treatment of chronic kidney disease
Audit tools
Findings
Final Considerations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call