Abstract
Abstract The present article engages with the custom critique and functional equivalents in the work of Jean d’Aspremont. It reflects on the emphasis given to the distinction between ascertainment and content-determination. If one engages in the politics of law-ascertainment, or the politics of sources and their evaluation, it is submitted here to adopt a contextualized perspective that includes content-determination as well. The article will conclude by pointing out three examples that merit ongoing attention in order to evaluate the distribution of normativity within a system of multiple sources.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
