Abstract
SummaryThis paper is a reflection on an article by Hellmuth et al., and is part of the point‐counterpart series. In this reflection, I consider the etymological origins of the term “authenticity” and explore the existential and phenomenological aspects of authenticity, action, and leadership. In particular, I note the absence of contextual issues such as gender.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
