Abstract
This article argues that Marx and Engels’ anti-utopianism was consistent and based on objective political and economic criteria. Marx and Engels were critical of the ideas and practices of followers of the early founders of socialist theory. Politically, they argued these followers were sectarian. Theoretically, a utopian understanding of political economy was partial and pseudo-scientific. This explained how the means sectarians promoted for achieving the socialist goal were ineffective. Utopianism consisted of a mismatch between ends and means. It was a form of unrealisable socialism. Marx and Engels did not try to prevent people thinking imaginatively about the classless society of the future. This is a distortion. It originated with Bernstein's revisionism. Stalinism and bourgeois sociology consolidated this misunderstanding. As a result anti-utopian Marxism has appeared to be an inconsistent form of conservative subjectivity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.