Abstract

The field of soil biological remediation was initially focused on the use of microorganisms. For organic contaminants, biostimulation and bioaugmentation were the strategies of choice. For heavy metals, bioremediation was centered on the feasibility of using microorganisms to reduce metal toxicity. Partly due to the impossibility to degrade metals, phytoremediation emerged proposing the use of plants to extract them (phytoextraction) or reduce their bioavailability (phytostabilization). Later, microbial-assisted phytoremediation addressed the inoculation of plant growth-promoting microorganisms to improve phytoremediation efficiency. Similarly, plant-assisted bioremediation examined the stimulatory effect of plant growth on the microbial degradation of soil contaminants. The combination of plants and microorganisms is nowadays often recommended for mixed contaminated soils. Finally, phytomanagement emerged as a phytotechnology focused on the use of plants and associated microorganisms to decrease contaminant linkages, maximize ecosystem services, and provide economic revenues. Although biological remediation methods have been in use for decades, the truth is that they have not yet yielded the expected results. Here, we claim that much more research is needed to make the most of the many ways that microorganisms have evolutionary developed to access the contaminants and to better understand the soil microbial networks responsible, to a great extent, for soil functioning.

Highlights

  • Soil contamination is an environmental problem that entails a serious threat to human and ecosystem health

  • Many contaminated soils are characterized by the simultaneous presence of organic and inorganic contaminants, making their remediation more difficult than it is already (Lacalle et al, 2018)

  • Most environmental legislations are based on total metal concentrations, not on bioavailable metal concentrations, leading to the impracticability of this phytotechnology from a legal point of view. This fact invalidates all those phytoremediation options aimed at removing the bioavailable contaminant fraction (“bioavailable contaminant stripping”), a target which considerably reduces the length of time required for soil remediation while addressing contaminant linkages (Moreira et al, 2021)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Soil contamination is an environmental problem that entails a serious threat to human and ecosystem health. Fungi (mycoremediation) and bacteria are simultaneously inoculated (Zaborowska et al, 2019) with potential synergistic effects Both strategies (biostimulation and bioaugmentation) have been largely used with varying degrees of success but, in particular, the use of bioaugmentation has produced many more failures than successes, due to, among other reasons, the lack of survival and/or proper growth of the inoculated microbial strains, owing to their lack of ecological competence in the recipient soil (Lacalle et al, 2020). Most environmental legislations are based on total metal concentrations, not on bioavailable metal concentrations, leading to the impracticability of this phytotechnology from a legal point of view This fact invalidates all those phytoremediation options aimed at removing the bioavailable contaminant fraction (“bioavailable contaminant stripping”), a target which considerably reduces the length of time required for soil remediation while addressing contaminant linkages (Moreira et al, 2021). The most desirable outcome of any remediation process is to eliminate the contaminant(s) provided this goal is achieved in an environmentally-friendly way

SYMBIOSIS APPROACHES
RESEARCH NEEDS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call