Abstract

Abstract. Accurate subsurface velocity models are crucial for geological interpretations based on seismic depth images. Seismic reflection tomography is an effective iterative method to update and refine a preliminary velocity model for depth imaging. Based on residual move-out analysis of reflectors in common image point gathers, an update of the velocity is estimated by a ray-based tomography. To stabilize the tomography, several preconditioning strategies exist. Most critical is the estimation of the depth error to account for the residual move-out of the reflector in the common image point gathers. Because the depth errors for many closely spaced image gathers must be picked, manual picking is extremely time-consuming, human biased, and not reproducible. Data-driven picking algorithms based on coherence or semblance analysis are widely used for hyperbolic or linear events. However, for complex-shaped depth events, purely data-driven picking is difficult. To overcome this, the warping method named non-rigid matching is used to estimate a depth error displacement field. Warping is used, for example, to merge photographic images or to match two seismic images from time-lapse data. By matching a common image point gather against its duplicate that has been shifted by one offset position, a locally smooth-shaped displacement field is calculated for each data sample by gather matching. Depending on the complexity of the subsurface, sample tracking through the displacement field along predefined horizons or on a simple regular grid yields discrete depth error values for the tomography. The application to a multi-channel seismic line across the Sunda subduction zone offshore Lombok island, Indonesia, illustrates the approach and documents the advantages of the method to estimate a detailed velocity structure in a complex tectonic regime. By incorporating the warping scheme into the reflection tomography, we demonstrate an increase in the velocity resolution and precision by improving the data-driven accuracy of depth error picks with arbitrary shapes. This approach offers the possibility to use the full capacities of tomography and further leads to more accurate interpretations of complex geological structures.

Highlights

  • By matching a common image point gather against its duplicate that has been shifted by one offset position, a locally smooth-shaped displacement field is calculated for each data sample by gather matching

  • By incorporating the warping scheme into the reflection tomography, we demonstrate an increase in the velocity resolution and precision by improving the data-driven accuracy of depth error picks with arbitrary shapes

  • Reflection tomography and pre-stack depth migration of multi-channel seismic reflection (MCS) data have evolved into standard seismic data processing routines in recent decades, owing to the rapid development of CPU performance and the effective adaption of seismic data processing software

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reflection tomography and pre-stack depth migration of multi-channel seismic reflection (MCS) data have evolved into standard seismic data processing routines in recent decades, owing to the rapid development of CPU performance and the effective adaption of seismic data processing software. The general procedure for reflection tomography is to go into the pre-stack migrated CIP offset domain and to measure the hyperbolic residual move-out of the depth misalignment ( called depth error) by manual picking or by automatic scanning techniques (Hardy, 2003; Claerbout, 1992). To circumnavigate these issues and increase the picking accuracy, we applied a warping technique called “nonrigid matching” (NRM). We apply a combination of NRM with ray-based reflection tomography to field data of pre-stack depth-migrated seismic sections from the Sunda convergent margin offshore Lombok island, Indone-. The reflection profile is characterized by an accretionary prism of strongly folded sediment with limited reflector continuity, which makes manual velocity estimation extremely challenging

Non-rigid and warping matching techniques
NRM synthetic data example
Depth-variant alignment from relative displacement correction
RMO automatic picking by tracking through NRM displacement field
Effective RMO selection based on semblance analysis
Methodology of the ray-based grid tomography with CIP depth errors
Study area and MCS data pre-processing
Initial velocity building from wide-angle tomography
Reflection tomography attribute data
Data examples
Sediment basin NRM tomography
Accretionary wedge NRM tomography
Upper-slope NRM tomography
Lower-slope NRM tomography
Final velocity model and reflectivity structure
Model uncertainties by tomography
Findings
Anisotropic tomography
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call