Abstract
Patients with neuromuscular scoliosis are a diverse group who are challenging to treat, with higher rates of surgical site infection following posterior spinal fusion than patients with idiopathic scoliosis1. Surgical site infection after posterior spinal fusion is costly, is difficult to manage, and may require multiple procedures including implant removal. Ramo et al. performed a retrospective review of patients at one institution who underwent posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis over a thirty-year period. They examined surgical site infection in this population and reviewed patient and treatment factors associated with surgical site infection. The study, which spans three decades, is the largest reported in the literature, with 428 patients and an …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.