Abstract
The in-chlorophyll centre waveband (ICCW) (640–680 nm) is the specific chlorophyll (Chl) absorption band, but the reflectance in this band has not been used as an optimal index for non-destructive determination of plant Chl content in recent decades. This study develops a new spectral index based solely on the ICCW for robust retrieval of leaf Chl content for the first time. A glasshouse experiment for solution-culture of one chlorophyll-deficient rice mutant and six wild types of rice genotypes was conducted, and the leaf reflectance (400–900 nm) was measured with a high spectral resolution (1 nm) spectrophotometer and the contents of chlorophyll a (Chla), chlorophyll b (Chlb) and chlorophyll a+b (Chlt) of the rice leaves were determined. It was found that the reflectance curves from 640 nm to 674 nm and from 675 nm to 680 nm of the low-chlorophyll mutant leaf were drastically steeper than that of the wild types in the ICCW. The new index based on the reflectance variation within ICCW, the difference of the first derivative sum within the ICCW (DFDS_ICCW), was highly sensitive (r = −0.77, n = 93, P<0.01) to Chlt while the mean reflectance (R_ICCW) in the ICCW became insensitive (r = −0.12, n = 93, P>0.05) to Chlt when the leaf Chlt was higher than 200 mg/m2. The best equations of R-ICCW and DFDS_ICCW yielded an RMSE of 78.7, 32.9 and 107.3 mg/m2, and an RMSE of 37.4, 16.0 and 45.3 mg/m−2, respectively, for predicting Chla, Chlb and Chlt. The new index could rank in the top 10 for prediction of Chla and Chlt as compared with the 55 existing indices. Additionally, most of the 55 existing Chl-related VIs performed robustly or strongly in simultaneous prediction of leaf Chla, Chlb and Chlt.
Highlights
Chlorophyll (Chl) a and Chl b are major constituents of the photosynthetic apparatus in higher plants
Leaf chlorophyll a (Chla) and chlorophyll b (Chlb) are determined with a traditional wet extraction analysis based on measuring the extinction of the extract at the major red absorption maxima of Chl a (,664 nm) and b (,647 nm) in the in-chlorophyll centre waveband (640–680 nm), and by inserting these values into simultaneous equations [2,3]
The leaves of the wild types were green in colour, the low N treatments were shallower in leaf colour than the normal N treatments
Summary
Chlorophyll (Chl) a and Chl b are major constituents of the photosynthetic apparatus in higher plants. Many studies have found that reflectance in the green and red-edge spectral regions was optimal for non-destructive estimation of leaf Chl content in a wide range of its variation [13,14,15,16]. Main et al (2011) [11] assessed the performance of 73 published VIs for leaf Chl estimation and found that the indices using off-chlorophyll absorption centre wavebands (OCCW) performed better than those using ICCW. No VIs based solely on ICCW for Chl estimation have been developed since Thomas and Gausman (1977) [12] found the saturated reflection of plant leaves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.