Abstract
Lessing's Erziehung des Menschengeschlechts (EdM) first appeared, albeit in incomplete form, appended to the fourth of Lessing's Gegensdtze zu Reimarus in 1777. It constitutes part of Lessing's response to the rationalistic polemic Lessing's Ungenannter, Hermann Samuel Reimarus, directed against many of the fundamental dogmas of orthodox Christianity, and seeks to define a position which preserves the authority of reason, while at the same time defining a legitimate historical role for revealed religion. I wish to investigate here the hermeneutical model Lessing puts forward in the EdM in the context of his response to Reimarus. We will see that while Lessing defines a progressive and teleological framework for his hermeneutics in contrast to Reimarus' static model, he nevertheless agrees with Reimarus that an interpretation which projects more into the words than they can contain is to be rejected. In other words, Lessing puts forward a hermeneutical model which requires that the interpretation of the Bible change over time (in opposition to Reimarus), but sets limits to this process using arguments similar to those Reimarus employs in his criticism of the allegorical Scriptural exegesis practiced by certain Jewish sects after the Babylonian Captivity.' We will also consider here the sources Lessing drew upon, in particular Wolffian semiotics, in order to explain the reasoning behind both the dynamic flexibility and the restrictions characteristic of the hermeneutical model Lessing employs in the EdM. But first, a brief review of the publishing history of the EdM in the context of the Fragmentenstreit. Under what conditions Lessing received a copy of Reimarus' Apologie oder Schutzschrift fir die verniinftigen Verehrer Gottes is unknown, but probably the manuscript came through either Elise or Johann Albert Heinrich Reimarus, the author's children, following the death of their father in 1768. Lessing explored the possibility of publishing the entire manuscript with Christian Friedrich Voss in Berlin in 1771, but had to abandon this plan when the theological censure in Berlin refused to give its imprimatur.2 Determined nevertheless to see Reimarus' work into print, Lessing decided to publish parts of it in his own journal, the Beitrige zur Geschichte
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.