Abstract

BackgroundIn 2008, the Swedish government introduced a National Rehabilitation Program, in which the government financially reimburses the county councils for evidence-based multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) interventions. The target group is patients of working age with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), expected to return to work or remain at work after rehabilitation. Much attention in the evaluations has been on patient outcomes and on processes. We lack knowledge about how factors related to health care providers and community can have an impact on how patients have access to MMR. The aim of this study was therefore to study the impact of health care provider and community related factors on referrals to MMR in patients with MSD applying for health care in primary health care.MethodsThis was a primary health care-based cohort study based on prospectively ascertained register data. All primary health care centres (PHCC) contracted in Region Skåne in 2010-2012, referring to MMR were included (n = 153). The health care provider factors studied were: community size, PHCC size, public or private PHCC, whether or not the PHCCs provided their own MMR, burden of illness and the community socioeconomic status among the registered population at the PHCCs. The results are presented with descriptive statistics and for the analysis, non-parametric and multiple linear regression analyses were applied.ResultsPHCCs located in larger communities sent more referrals/1000 registered population (p = 0.020). Private PHCCs sent more referrals/1000 registered population compared to public units (p = 0.035). Factors related to more MMR referrals/1000 registered population in the multiple regression analyses were PHCCs located in medium and large communities and with above average socioeconomic status among the registered population at the PHCCs, private PHCC and PHCCs providing their own MMR. The explanation degree for the final model was 24.5%.ConclusionsWe found that referral rates to MMR were positively associated with PHCCs located in medium and large sized communities with higher socioeconomic status among the registered population, private PHCCs and PHCCs providing their own MMR. Patients with MSD are thus facing significant inequities and were thus not offered the same opportunities for referrals to rehabilitation regardless of which PHCC they visited.

Highlights

  • In 2008, the Swedish government introduced a National Rehabilitation Program, in which the government financially reimburses the county councils for evidence-based multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) interventions

  • The care burden measured by Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) and Care Need Index (CNI) varied significantly between primary health care centres (PHCC)

  • In 2011, two PHCCs did not send any referral to Multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) and in 2012 four PHCCs did not send any referral to MMR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2008, the Swedish government introduced a National Rehabilitation Program, in which the government financially reimburses the county councils for evidence-based multimodal rehabilitation (MMR) interventions. We lack knowledge about how factors related to health care providers and community can have an impact on how patients have access to MMR. The aim of this study was to study the impact of health care provider and community related factors on referrals to MMR in patients with MSD applying for health care in primary health care. In 2012, 25% of those on sick leave were so due to these disorders (personal communication, The Swedish Social Insurance Agency) and incidence and costs are increasing [5]. Most patients in Sweden with MSD get their first treatment in primary health care (PHC) and when patients need they can receive further rehabilitation by referral from the primary health care centres (PHCC) to secondary care. In 2012, about 20-30% of the total numbers of visits in PHC were made by patients with MSD [7] and patients diagnosed with back pain consumed twice as much health care resource as the general population [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call